Choosing the wrong rigid flex PCB manufacturing partner costs more than money—it delays product launches, damages reputation, and creates expensive quality issues. After supporting 500+ clients in factory evaluations, we've identified 15 critical checkpoints that reveal manufacturing capability and reliability.
Manufacturing Capabilities Assessment
☑ Checkpoint 1: In-House Rigid and Flex Production
Why this matters:
Factories outsourcing flexible sections lose quality control, add lead time, and increase cost. Full integration essential for reliable rigid flex PCB manufacturing.
How to verify:
- "Do you manufacture both rigid and flexible sections in your facility?"
- Request facility tour or video showing both processes
- Ask what percentage of rigid flex is fully in-house
Red flags:
- ❌ "We partner with specialized flex suppliers"
- ❌ Evasive answers about facility capabilities
- ❌ Unwilling to show manufacturing areas
HILPCB capability: ✓ Complete in-house manufacturing from FR4 PCB rigid sections through flex PCB processing to final lamination—single facility, full control.
☑ Checkpoint 2: Layer Count Capability
Capability levels:
- Entry level: 2-4 layers
- Intermediate: 4-8 layers
- Advanced: 8-16 layers
- Expert: 16+ layers with HDI PCB features
Verification:
- Request sample boards at your required layer count
- Ask about maximum layers successfully produced
- Verify blind/buried via capability if needed
Match to your needs:
- Simple products: 2-4 layer capability sufficient
- Consumer electronics: 4-8 layer needed
- High-performance: 8+ layers required
- Complex systems: Advanced HDI capability essential
We manufacture rigid sections up to 64 layers combined with flexible sections up to 8 layers—capability proven through automotive and aerospace projects.
☑ Checkpoint 3: Minimum Feature Capability
Critical specifications:
- Minimum trace width/spacing
- Minimum drill size
- Via types (through-hole, blind, buried)
- Pad sizes and tolerances
Typical capabilities:
Entry level: 0.15mm/0.15mm (6/6 mil) Intermediate: 0.10mm/0.10mm (4/4 mil) Advanced: 0.075mm/0.075mm (3/3 mil)
Verification method: Upload your design using gerber viewer to verify features, then ask: "Can you reliably manufacture 0.XXmm traces at volume?"
☑ Checkpoint 4: Material Options
Essential material inventory:
- Adhesive-based polyimide (cost-effective)
- Adhesiveless polyimide (high-reliability)
- Multiple FR4 grades (high-Tg PCB options)
- Rolled annealed copper (multiple weights)
- Specialty materials as needed
Questions to ask:
- "What polyimide types do you stock?"
- "Do you offer both adhesive and adhesiveless?"
- "What's lead time for non-standard materials?"
Red flags:
- ❌ Limited to single polyimide type
- ❌ Long lead times for common materials
- ❌ Unwilling to discuss material options
☑ Checkpoint 5: Lamination Equipment
Critical equipment: Dedicated rigid-flex lamination presses with:
- Precise pressure control (non-uniform pressure destroys boards)
- Temperature uniformity (±5°C across press area)
- Vacuum capability (eliminates voids)
- Multiple press cycles capability
Verification:
- "What type of lamination presses do you use?"
- "How do you control pressure in rigid and flex sections?"
- Request lamination process flow diagram
Poor lamination equipment causes:
- Delamination failures
- Warpage issues
- Inconsistent electrical properties
- Low first-pass yield

Quality System Verification
☑ Checkpoint 6: Certifications
Essential certifications:
- ISO 9001:2015 (quality management—minimum requirement)
- IPC-A-600 (PCB acceptance criteria)
- IPC-A-610 (assembly acceptance)
- UL certification (safety requirements)
Industry-specific certifications:
- ISO 13485 (medical devices)
- IATF 16949 (automotive)
- AS9100 (aerospace)
- RoHS/REACH compliance
Verification:
- Request certificate copies (not just logos)
- Verify certification scope covers rigid flex
- Check expiration dates
- Confirm through issuing body if critical
We maintain ISO 9001:2015, ISO 13485:2016, and industry-specific certifications with complete documentation available.
☑ Checkpoint 7: First-Pass Yield Rates
Industry standards:
- Mediocre: <80% FPY
- Acceptable: 80-90% FPY
- Good: 90-95% FPY
- Excellent: >95% FPY
Why this matters: Low FPY indicates:
- Process control problems
- Quality issues
- Longer lead times (rework needed)
- Higher costs passed to customer
Questions:
- "What's your typical first-pass yield for rigid flex?"
- "How do you track and report FPY?"
- "What happens if boards fail initial test?"
Red flags:
- ❌ Refuses to discuss FPY
- ❌ No tracking system
- ❌ Below 80% yield rates
☑ Checkpoint 8: Testing Capabilities
Mandatory testing:
- Electrical testing (all circuits verified)
- Visual inspection (IPC-A-600 standards)
- Dimensional verification
- Cross-sectional analysis (sample basis)
Advanced testing:
- Flex cycle testing (dynamic applications)
- Thermal cycling capability
- Microsection analysis
- Impedance testing (controlled impedance designs)
Verification:
- "What testing do you perform on every board?"
- "Do you offer flex cycle testing?"
- Request test reports from similar project
Our complete testing includes electrical testing, flex cycle validation, and comprehensive quality documentation with every order.
☑ Checkpoint 9: DFM Analysis Process
Professional DFM review covers:
- Rigid-flex transition zone geometry
- Bend radius verification
- Material selection appropriateness
- Manufacturing feasibility
- Cost optimization opportunities
Questions:
- "Do you provide free DFM analysis?"
- "What's turnaround time for DFM review?"
- "Can you suggest cost reductions?"
What good DFM includes:
- Specific design concerns identified
- Recommended corrections
- Cost impact of changes
- Alternative approaches suggested
Red flags:
- ❌ No DFM review offered
- ❌ Generic checklist only
- ❌ Charge for DFM analysis
- ❌ Slow turnaround (>24 hours)
Submit design through our quote request page for comprehensive DFM feedback within 4-8 hours.
Production Capabilities
☑ Checkpoint 10: Lead Time Reliability
Realistic lead times:
- Prototypes (5-10 pieces): 10-14 days
- Small production (<100): 15-18 days
- Volume production: 20-25 days
- Express service: 7-10 days (premium cost)
Verification:
- Ask about recent on-time delivery performance
- Request references you can contact
- Check online reviews for delivery complaints
Red flags:
- ❌ Promises unrealistic lead times
- ❌ History of delays
- ❌ No tracking system
- ❌ Unclear communication about delays
We track on-time delivery >96% for rigid flex PCB manufacturing orders with real-time status updates.
☑ Checkpoint 11: Minimum Order Quantity
Typical MOQs:
- Flexible factories: No minimum or 1-5 pieces
- Standard factories: 25-50 pieces minimum
- High-volume only: 100+ pieces
For prototyping: Need factory accepting 5-10 piece orders without penalty pricing. Many claim "no MOQ" but price becomes unreasonable below certain quantity.
For production: Verify factory handles your anticipated volumes:
- Low volume: 50-500 units
- Medium volume: 500-5,000 units
- High volume: 5,000+ units
Questions:
- "What's realistic minimum for prototypes?"
- "How does pricing scale with volume?"
- "Any setup fees or NRE charges?"
☑ Checkpoint 12: Assembly Capabilities
Critical consideration: Using separate factory for assembly adds:
- 2-3 weeks to timeline
- Coordination complexity
- Quality accountability issues
- Shipping risks
Integrated approach benefits: Single factory providing rigid-flex PCB fabrication plus SMT assembly offers:
- 40% faster completion
- Single quality responsibility
- Better design optimization
- Cost efficiency
Verify assembly capability:
- SMT equipment and capability
- Experience with rigid flex handling
- Component sourcing services
- Testing after assembly
We offer complete turnkey assembly services from PCB fabrication through final product assembly and testing.

Business Relationship Factors
☑ Checkpoint 13: Engineering Support
Pre-sales support:
- Design consultation available?
- Material selection guidance?
- Stack-up recommendations?
- Cost optimization assistance?
During production:
- Single point of contact?
- Proactive communication?
- Issue escalation process?
- Design change handling?
Post-delivery:
- Technical support for assembly?
- Failure analysis capability?
- Continuous improvement feedback?
Questions:
- "Who will be my main contact?"
- "How do you handle technical questions?"
- "What if issues arise during production?"
☑ Checkpoint 14: Pricing Transparency
Quote should include:
- Itemized costs (materials, processing, testing)
- Volume pricing breaks
- Tooling or NRE fees
- Shipping costs
- Payment terms
Red flags:
- ❌ Vague "lump sum" quotes
- ❌ Hidden fees discovered later
- ❌ Unwilling to explain pricing
- ❌ Dramatically lower than others (quality concerns)
Realistic pricing expectations: Don't choose based solely on lowest price. 15% cheaper quote often becomes 30% more expensive through:
- Quality issues requiring rework
- Delivery delays
- Communication problems
- Hidden fees
☑ Checkpoint 15: Reference Verification
Request and contact references:
- Similar project type
- Similar volume level
- Similar industry
Questions for references:
- "What's been your experience?"
- "Any quality issues encountered?"
- "How's communication and responsiveness?"
- "Would you use them again?"
- "Any surprises or issues?"
Online research:
- Check independent review sites
- Search for complaints
- Industry forum discussions
- Trade show presence
Making Your Decision
Scoring System
Rate each checkpoint: 0 (poor), 1 (acceptable), 2 (good), 3 (excellent)
Score interpretation:
- 40-45: Excellent partner (proceed with confidence)
- 35-39: Good partner (acceptable with minor concerns)
- 30-34: Marginal (significant concerns, consider alternatives)
- <30: Avoid (too many deficiencies)
Final Evaluation
Don't compromise on:
- In-house rigid and flex manufacturing
- Appropriate layer count capability
- Relevant certifications
- DFM analysis offering
- Reasonable lead times
Can be flexible on:
- Newest equipment (if proven process)
- Every possible material in stock
- Lowest possible pricing
Getting Started
Evaluation Process
- Initial contact - Submit design through quote request
- DFM review - Evaluate their technical feedback
- Quote analysis - Review pricing transparency
- Facility verification - Request certifications, equipment details
- Reference checks - Contact previous clients
- Prototype order - Validate with small initial order
Document Requirements
Prepare for factory evaluation:
- Complete Gerber files
- Fabrication drawing
- Target quantities
- Quality requirements
- Timeline expectations
Use our gerber viewer to verify file completeness before submission.
Frequently Asked Questions
Should I get quotes from multiple rigid flex PCB manufacturing factories?
Yes for first-time projects—compare 3-4 factories. But look beyond price at DFM quality, communication, and capability match. After finding good partner, stick with them for consistency.
How important is facility visit for evaluation?
Helpful but not mandatory. Remote verification through:
- Detailed technical discussions
- Reference checks
- Sample board evaluation
- Documentation review Often sufficient, especially for prototype/low-volume projects.
What's most important checkpoint on this list?
In-house manufacturing capability (#1) and DFM analysis process (#9). These reveal true expertise and commitment to quality more than any other factors.
Do you offer all 15 checkpoint capabilities?
Yes—we've designed evaluation checklist around our own capabilities. Complete in-house rigid flex PCB manufacturing, comprehensive quality systems, engineering support, and proven track record across industries. Request detailed capability documentation with quote.
How long should factory evaluation take?
For prototypes: 1-2 days sufficient For production: 1-2 weeks thorough evaluation For critical/high-volume: Consider prototype validation before committing to production partnership
Ready to evaluate rigid flex PCB manufacturing partners systematically? Submit your design and requirements through our quote request page. Receive detailed information addressing all 15 checkpoint areas within 4-8 hours, enabling thorough factory capability assessment.

