In the precise world of industrial robot control systems, PCBs (Printed Circuit Boards) are far more than just green substrates carrying electronic components. They serve as the neural network of the organism, the central hub ensuring precise movements and timely responses, and the last line of defense safeguarding human-machine collaboration. As a control engineer with years of deep expertise in functional safety, I have witnessed production line halts and even more severe safety incidents caused by minor hardware flaws. These experiences have taught me a profound lesson: for high-reliability, high-safety applications like industrial robots, any complacency is a shortcut to disaster. Therefore, we must adopt testing and verification methods that go beyond conventional practices, and Boundary-Scan/JTAG (IEEE 1149.1 standard) is the sharpest scalpel in our toolkit. It delves into the "capillaries" of hardware, ensuring that complex, high-density circuit boards are flawless in functional integrity and safety compliance. This technology is not a one-time production test but spans the entire product lifecycle-from conceptual design and prototype validation to mass production and field maintenance-providing unparalleled depth of insight and control to achieve stringent functional safety goals.

Dual-Channel Safety Architecture: Leveraging Boundary-Scan/JTAG to Quantitatively Improve Diagnostic Coverage and Periodic Testing

The cornerstone of industrial robot safety control is redundancy design, with the dual-channel (or multi-channel) architecture being the classic paradigm for achieving fault tolerance and fail-safe operation. The core idea is: two or more independent processing channels operate in parallel, executing the same safety-critical tasks while monitoring each other. If any channel fails, the system can detect the anomaly through comparison and arbitration mechanisms and immediately transition to a predefined safe state (e.g., cutting off motor power). However, this theoretically perfect model faces significant challenges in engineering practice: How can we ensure these two channels are truly independent physically and electrically? How can we verify that their cross-monitoring logic responds correctly and promptly to various potential faults?

Traditional "black-box" functional testing-powering up the system and running application software to observe its behavior-is almost powerless here. It might uncover some logic errors, but for potential hardware-level defects, such as tiny solder bridges between channels or invisible cold solder joints under BGA (Ball Grid Array) packages, it is helpless. These defects may only manifest under specific temperature, vibration, or voltage fluctuations, becoming latent "time bombs."

Boundary-Scan/JTAG technology offers a revolutionary "white-box" testing solution. By embedding a "Boundary-Scan Cell" between each digital pin and the core logic of JTAG-compatible ICs (such as microprocessors, FPGAs, and CPLDs), and connecting all these cells into a serially accessible scan chain, we gain unprecedented control and observation capabilities over these pins-without running any functional code.

Using this JTAG chain, we can perform a series of high-value structured tests:

1. Verifying Electrical Isolation Between Channels: This is the first step in validating the independence of redundant designs. Test engineers can write JTAG test vectors-for example, forcing a critical output pin (such as one driving a safety relay) on Channel A to a high level via the JTAG chain, then reading back the state of the corresponding monitoring input pin on Channel B. Ideally, Channel B's pin state should remain unchanged. If Channel B's pin also goes high, it clearly indicates an unintended electrical short between the two supposedly isolated channels. This test achieves 100% coverage for all digital I/O short-circuit fault modes, with precision and coverage unmatched by any other method.

2. Controlled, Repeatable Fault Injection: Functional safety standards require exhaustive validation of safety mechanisms, and fault injection is a critical part of this. JTAG makes fault injection precise and efficient. We can simulate various hardware faults, such as:

• Stuck-at-Fault: Force a specific input pin on Channel B to remain at a high level (Stuck-at-1) or low level (Stuck-at-0) to simulate an open or short circuit in the sensor signal line. We then observe whether the monitoring logic on Channel A can detect this "unreasonable" static signal within the specified time (Fault Tolerant Time Interval, FTTI) and trigger a safety shutdown.
• Timing Fault Simulation: Precisely control the timing of pin state transitions via JTAG to simulate signal delays or jitter, verifying the system's timing tolerance and the effectiveness of the Clock Monitoring Unit (CMU).

3. Quantitative Improvement in Diagnostic Coverage (DC): According to functional safety standards such as IEC 61508 and ISO 13849, Diagnostic Coverage (DC) is a key metric for evaluating a safety system's ability to detect its own hardware faults, directly determining the achievable Safety Integrity Level (SIL) or Performance Level (PL). DC is defined as the ratio of "dangerous, detectable failure rates" to "total dangerous failure rates." JTAG testing can cover many blind spots of traditional functional testing, such as:
   • Unused IC pins (are they floating or accidentally connected?).
   • All connections in complex bus topologies.
   • Pin interconnections in high-density packages like BGA and LGA that cannot be physically probed.
   • The boundary scan logic inside the IC itself. By combining the results of JTAG Interconnect Tests with FMEDA (Failure Modes, Effects, and Diagnostic Analysis), we can significantly increase the hardware's diagnostic coverage from the 70%-80% (medium DC) achievable through functional testing to over 99% (high DC), a prerequisite for achieving SIL 3 or PLe levels.

The foundation of this success lies in conducting comprehensive and meticulous DFM/DFT/DFA reviews (Design for Manufacturability/Testability/Assembly) during the design phase. Ensuring the correct implementation of JTAG scan chains in complex designs with extremely high routing density, such as HDI PCB, including signal path integrity, termination resistor configuration, and TAP interface physical layout, is a prerequisite for unlocking their full potential.

Emergency Stop Circuit: End-to-End Integrity Verification from Physical Solder Joints to Logical Functions

The Emergency Stop (E-Stop) circuit is the highest-priority protective layer in an industrial robot's safety system. It must be capable of cutting off the hazard source (typically the power to the robot's servo motor) in the most direct and reliable manner under any circumstances. A typical E-Stop circuit consists of a series or parallel arrangement of components such as physical buttons, safety relays or contactors, optocouplers, and input/output pins of microcontrollers. Its core design principle is "fail-safe," meaning any single component failure (e.g., cable breakage, relay contact welding) should cause the system to enter a safe state.

Traditional methods fall short when verifying such a "life-critical" circuit. Multimeters can only measure static continuity, and oscilloscopes can observe signal waveforms, but neither can address the core issue-those solder joints hidden beneath BGA packages, inaccessible to the naked eye or probes. A BGA solder joint with "head-in-pillow" defects may appear flawless under X-Ray inspection and might even pass functional testing at room temperature by chance. However, during operational temperature rises or mechanical vibrations, it can form transient open circuits, leading to the loss of E-Stop signals with potentially catastrophic consequences.

Boundary-Scan/JTAG precisely addresses this critical gap. It shifts the focus of testing from physical form to electrical connectivity itself. We can design a JTAG test program to meticulously verify the integrity of the entire digital chain-from the E-Stop signal entering the MCU's input pin, through the MCU's internal logic processing, to the output pin driving the safety relay.

The specific operational workflow is as follows:

1. Input Link Verification: Simulate the pressing and releasing actions of the E-Stop button on the test fixture, and monitor the boundary scan cells of the MCU's corresponding input pins in real-time through the JTAG port. Confirm whether their state can correctly transition from high to low level and back to high level. This not only verifies external connections but also incidentally tests whether the pull-up/pull-down resistor configurations of the pins are correct.
2. Internal Logic Path Verification: Although JTAG cannot directly test the chip's core logic, we can combine JTAG with the processor's debugging capabilities (typically also accessed via the JTAG interface) to single-step execute the interrupt service routine handling the E-Stop signal. Observe changes in relevant registers to verify whether the software-level debounce algorithm and signal filtering logic work as expected.
3. Output Link Verification: Use JTAG to force the MCU's output pin driving the safety relay to toggle between safe (e.g., low level) and non-safe (high level) states. Simultaneously, monitor the driving signal of the safety relay coil using external instruments or another JTAG chain to ensure the path from the MCU pin to the relay input is unobstructed.

This in-depth, end-to-end connectivity testing holds immeasurable value during the First Article Inspection (FAI) phase. The goal of FAI is to ensure that the first batch of products meets the design intent in terms of electrical performance, component placement, and manufacturing processes. An FAI document including JTAG test reports can provide 100% coverage to prove that all digital networks' electrical connections are correct, establishing a solid quality baseline for subsequent mass production.

Of course, JTAG is not a panacea-it must work in tandem with physical inspection methods such as SPI/AOI/X-Ray inspection. SPI (Solder Paste Inspection) ensures the "raw material" of soldering is qualified, AOI (Automated Optical Inspection) verifies the "appearance" of components, X-Ray examines the "skeletal" morphology of solder joints internally, and JTAG ultimately confirms whether the entire circuit's "nervous system" is connected. Together, these four methods build a comprehensive quality assurance system spanning from physical form to electrical functionality.

Watchdog and Test Pulses: Precise Verification of Failure Detection Mechanisms and Rapid Fault Response Time

In dynamically operating systems, redundancy alone is insufficient; continuous health monitoring mechanisms are essential. Watchdog Timer (WDT) and I/O test pulses are two of the most commonly used dynamic self-testing techniques.

• Watchdog: The basic principle is that the main processor must periodically "feed the watchdog" (reset the watchdog timer) within a preset time window to indicate it is still operating normally. If the processor fails to "feed the watchdog" on time due to software deadlocks, hardware lockups, or other reasons, the watchdog timer will time out and generate a system reset signal or trigger a safety output.
• Test Pulse: Primarily used to periodically detect whether digital output channels and their connected lines have "stuck-at" faults (Stuck-at-0 or Stuck-at-1). For example, an output driving a safety actuator should normally remain high during operation. The system will periodically pull it low for an extremely brief duration (a few microseconds) and then immediately check via an independent readback path whether the pin's level has indeed dropped. If the readback level remains high, it indicates a potential short circuit to the power supply or a damaged driver.

Validating the effectiveness of these dynamic mechanisms, particularly their Fault Reaction Time, is critical for meeting safety standards. The standards explicitly define the maximum allowable time from fault occurrence to the system entering a safe state.

Boundary-Scan/JTAG plays an irreplaceable role as both a "referee" and a "high-precision stopwatch" in this process. During system development and validation, we can:

1. Precisely Validate Watchdog Timeout: Using JTAG's debugging interface, we can halt the processor's core just before executing the "feed watchdog" instruction, simulating the worst-case scenario of processor "lockup." Simultaneously, we start an external high-precision timer and monitor the reset signal line generated by the watchdog. The time from processor halt to reset signal activation represents the most accurate watchdog timeout measurement. This method eliminates all software delays, directly measuring the hardware's response capability.
2. Validate the Complete Test Pulse Chain: We can use JTAG to initiate and verify test pulses. For instance, JTAG can force an FPGA output pin to generate a test pulse, and then, via the same JTAG chain, read the state of a microcontroller input pin connected to it after hundreds of clock cycles. This verifies whether the microsecond-level pulse was successfully captured, ensuring the integrity of the entire physical path from pulse generation to PCB trace transmission and signal reception.

For small-batch or prototype validation, while Flying Probe Test can provide electrical connectivity information between any two points on the board, it is a static test. Unlike JTAG, it cannot validate time-dependent safety mechanisms in the context of dynamic system operation. A flying probe test can confirm that points A and B are connected, but JTAG can verify whether a 1-microsecond pulse emitted from point A is correctly received at point B within 500 nanoseconds. In safety-critical real-time systems, this difference is decisive.

SIL/PL Target Decomposition and DFT Strategy Integration in Hardware Architecture

Achieving a specific SIL (Safety Integrity Level) or PL (Performance Level) target is a systems engineering effort that follows the V-model development process. It begins with top-level safety requirements and cascades down to hardware and software implementation and validation measures. Design for Testability (DFT) plays a pivotal bridging role in this process-it is no longer an afterthought post-design but a core activity parallel to functional and safety design. A well-considered DFT strategy streamlines subsequent validation, production testing, and field diagnostics while providing robust objective evidence for safety certification.

Making Boundary-Scan/JTAG the cornerstone of the DFT strategy requires meticulous planning during the schematic design and PCB layout phases at the project's outset:

• Scan Chain Design: Determine which ICs should be included in the JTAG scan chain. Ideally, all critical, high-pin-count digital ICs should be daisy-chained. Consider the scan chain length, as excessively long chains increase test time. For complex boards, multiple independent scan chains can be designed and managed in parallel by a single JTAG controller.
• Signal Integrity: The JTAG clock signal (TCK) is highly sensitive to signal quality. During PCB layout, ensure TCK traces are as short as possible,远离噪声源 (away from noise sources), and properly impedance-matched and terminated to prevent signal reflection-induced test failures.
• Physical Interface: Design a standard, easily connectable physical interface (such as 2.54mm or 1.27mm pitch headers) for the JTAG TAP port, and position it on the PCB in a location that is easily accessible by test fixtures or programmers.

This series of tasks requires close collaboration with experienced professional PCB manufacturers like HILPCB during the DFM/DFT/DFA review phase. Their engineers can review your design from manufacturing and testing perspectives, offering optimization suggestions such as adjusting test point locations to improve flying probe test accessibility or optimizing JTAG connector layouts to simplify the assembly process.

All test data, whether from JTAG structural tests, SPI/AOI/X-Ray inspection physical checks, or final functional tests, must be systematically recorded and managed. This is where Traceability/MES (Manufacturing Execution System) comes into play. Every PCB leaving the factory should have a unique serial number, and all test data, repair records, and component batch information during production should be tied to this serial number and stored in a database. This not only meets mandatory requirements for safety product certifications (e.g., TÜV, UL) but also enables full lifecycle traceability of the product. When issues arise in the field, we can quickly retrieve the complete "birth records" of the board for root cause analysis or even proactively recall products from the same batch that may have potential risks. Choosing a supplier that offers one-stop turnkey assembly services ensures the strict execution of the entire DFT strategy, from design review to data traceability.

Get PCB Quote

Conclusion: JTAG, Beyond Testing, as the Cornerstone of Safety and Quality

Reviewing the full text, Boundary-Scan/JTAG in the development and manufacturing of industrial robot control PCBs plays a role far beyond a mere "testing technology." It is a systematic methodology for quality and safety assurance that spans the entire product lifecycle.

• In the design phase, it is the core of DFT strategy, guiding us to build a robust, inherently verifiable hardware architecture.
• In the prototype validation phase, it helps us verify the independence of dual-channel redundancy, the integrity of E-Stop circuits, and the dynamic response times of safety mechanisms like watchdogs with unprecedented depth and precision.
• In the production phase, it becomes a powerful tool against hidden manufacturing defects (such as BGA cold solder joints) in high-density packaging, working alongside SPI/AOI/X-Ray to build an unbreakable quality firewall.
• Throughout the product lifecycle, it integrates with Traceability/MES systems to create an indelible "digital DNA" for each PCB, providing a data foundation for safety certification, field maintenance, and continuous improvement.

Amid the wave of Industry 4.0, robots will become more intelligent, human-robot collaboration will grow closer, and functional safety requirements will reach unprecedented heights. Overcoming these challenges requires embedding quality and safety genes from the very beginning of design. Partnering with HILPCB-a company with deep technical expertise, rigorous quality control systems, and comprehensive testing capabilities-to maximize the potential of Boundary-Scan/JTAG is a wise choice to ensure your safety control systems operate stably, reliably, and safely in the harshest industrial environments. This is not only a responsibility to the product but also a reverence for life.

Related links

• HDI PCB
• turnkey assembly